Why should In-app payments be treated by telecommunications business laws?

The passage of the In-app billing force prevented law has exceeded the 8th ridge. App Market concludes that it must be governed by a special market area as a special market area. Through the Standing Committee, he has left only the law of law and the discussion of the Legal Justice Committee.

Google is a process of debating the app market payment market and trying to raise a batch fee to a digital contents ecosystem. In addition to domestic but also in the United States, legislation is being discussed in the ICT special law in the House of Representatives.

In this Act, Google and Fair Trade Commission, a regulatory party, do not bend the opposite voice. Google is an atmosphere that attracts a new payment method policy according to legislation procedures. In addition, the process is duplicated, and it shows that in the process of submitting the legislation of the Science and Technology Information Broadcasting Communication Commission.

In the event of the In-app settlement of the In-app, the Domestic Digital Content Creators, the Passage of the Faith is the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction that the process requires the process. However, in consideration of duplicate regulations according to the general competition law, it is a chief need for the overall regulation through the specialization of the app market, considering the specificity of the app market.

** ■ How was the Rough In-app billing method,

Google's App Market Payment Market is the most active in the monopoly. Last summer, after the atmosphere of Google's payment means policy change was detected in the summer global ICT industry, in Korea, in Korea, the discussion of the legislative response to the Freight of the National Assembly in Korea when the discussion of Korona 19 due to Corona 19 was in the middle of Korea.

Without covering the field, the flesh belongs to the outbreak of the telecommunications business law, and the hearing, the hearing, of course, and the hearing and seminars continued without covering the National Assembly. Numerous discussions have been followed in digital content creators that have forced to hit a direct sales by Google's actions.

As a result, three members of the Democratic Party, 3 of the KIF of the KIF of the KIF of the KIF, and one of the universal members, the bill, respectively, the legislation was handled as an integrated alternative, It was designed.

Business Laws 50 deals with the prohibition of the App Market Providers. The most important part of triggering legislation was included in N9. The transaction status is unfairly used to forbids the behavior of certain payment methods.

In addition, the act of inducing the mobile content to be registered in other app markets, the judges delayed delays and deletion activities, and other discriminatory conditions limiting, and other discriminatory conditions.

In addition to prohibited, the Broadcasting Communications Commission and the Department of Information and Communications The Department of Information and Communications Department have provided the application basis for the App Market Survey, and the various user disputes in the app market have been included in a communications dispute.

■ Appreciation of App Market Regulation, 2 provisions of 2 provisions

With the promotion of app market regulation through telecommunication business law, the process did not bend the position of redundant. The Fair Trade Mobility, the Fair Trade Act, which means to discipline the antitrust semi-competition, which is commonly applied in all industries.

In other words, it is claimed that the regulation of the process will be duplicated when the Common Communication Business Act is passed through the telecommunication business law in the National Assembly.

App marketers, such as Google, a regulatory party, led to the argument of the fair. Although it is already regulated by the general law, it is more rapidly considered to avoid regulations through the Special Act, a special law.

In addition to the above-mentioned sigh, the issue of the issue of the issue of the issue of the issue of the issue of the issue of the issue and passed the entire meeting and passed the revision of the telecommunication business law for the entire meeting. did.

The prohibition of enforcing and inducing acts to prevent the act of inducing the acts that do not register with other app markets, and 13, which prohibits imposing discriminative conditions and limitations of the destination and limitations, can be a problem with the Fair Trade Act.

The Combat Meeting, "The platform market, such as app market, is not a general linear market, but because there is a nature of the duplex market, it should be governed by the general law," We are reflecting the business step-by-step characteristics of the market ecosystem, and it would be more difficult to carry out such specific acts in the general law. "

An official of another department said, "There is a logical contradiction on the argument of the process of leaving the possibility of deducums and claiming the possibility of redundant, and may be misunderstood," said the " I am specified that I can not impose corrective action by law. If the process is talking about deduplication concerns, I mean, I mean, I will ignore the law that I do not. "

** ■ I have to deal with a special law ... I have not been able to get rid of regulations.

In the ICT industry and the laws of the Industrial and the law, it is an atmosphere that can not be controversial to the end of the National Assembly of the In-App payment method.

The Telecommunications Business Act has a special corporate character of the general competitive law for telecommunications operators and means that it is reasonable to introduce the provisions in accordance with the Priority Procedure of Special Act on the Priority Principles of Special Act on Special Code,

The telecommunications industry official pointed out that the controversy, which is considered as a representative competition policy, as a representative competition policy, as a representative competitive policy in the telecommunications business law. "

In particular, in terms of regulatory fully equipped, 50-10, Section 10, and 13, which have a problem with the last issue, have emphasized the need to be passed as the original rights. In addition to the provisions of the Payment Meaning of Payment Means, there is a description that other provisions are covered with other provisions.

"The Regulations of the Association of Disclaimer shall, in addition to the App Market Provent and Developer Relations," In addition to the App Market Provent and Developer Relations, Therefore, it is a problem in terms of user protection of telecommunication services. "

Then, "If the provision of the provision is not a professional regulatory organs, it may cause problems to deepen redundant regulations," if it is removed from a regular competition regulatory institution area, "said," App Market The Delays App Market The Delay is covered by the Telecommunications Business Act and Dealing in the Fair Trade Act, both the app market operators, as well as the digital content developers, and they will be confused and regulatory inefficiencies. "